ICN Durban 2009

International Council of Nurses 24th Quadrennial Conference Report
Durban, South Africa
27th June to 4th July 2009

The theme of the 24th ICN Quadrennial conference was ‘Leading Change; Building Healthier Nations’. The conference brought together approximately 5,600 nurses from 129 countries. Ethics was a core theme in many of the main sessions as keynote speakers emphasised the inter-relationship between health and social justice, the impact of professional migration and the challenges of maintaining professionalism in very difficult circumstances.

Other sessions debated the ethics of industrial action and reported on a wide range of ethics-related research initiatives. Samantha Pang from Hong Kong and colleagues from Japan and Taiwan shared findings from their ‘good nurse/bad nurse’ studies in the Far East and discussed the impact of ‘good nurses’ and ‘bad nurses’. Jan Storch and colleagues from Canada shared findings from their research relating to the moral climate of healthcare organisations and the moral distress of nurses. Joan Miller, Verena Tschudin and Samantha Pang discussed the significance of ‘good work’ in nursing. Good work is work that is excellent, ethical and engaging and has four constituents: personal standards; professional standards; forces of the field; and forces of society. Research in this area has suggested factors that compromise good work such as nursing shortages, lack of time, conflicting values, lack of autonomy and insufficient resources (see www.goodworkproject.org).

The Ethics\human rights strand of the ICN Congress was well attended and included a wide range of presentations on topics such as: the development of professional codes; patient perceptions of privacy; the relationship between ethics and cultural safety; dignity in care; the development of clinical ethics committee; and the relationship between religion, culture and professional ethics.

Pre-ICN Nursing Ethics Conference – 28th June 2009
Prior to the ICN conference the International Centre for Nursing Ethics collaborated with colleagues at the School of Nursing at the Kwa-Zulu Natal University to run a one-day conference on the theme of ‘Transcultural Ethics: Learning from Each Other’. There were four keynote speakers:

Ebin Arries from the University of Johannesburg, South Africa – ‘An African ethic: humanisation of a dehumanised workplace?’
Margaret Pharris from The College of St Catherine’s, Minneapolis, USA – ‘Critical Multiculturalism: creating inclusive nursing education environments’
Anita van der Merwe from the University of the Free State, South Africa – Nurse leadership and ethics in Africa’ and
Paul Wainwright from Kingston University and St George’s University of London, UK – ‘Is a transcultural ethics viable?’

In the course of the day there was discussion of differences and similarities in our cultural, political, health and social contexts. We examined our different histories and biographies and considered how this may impact on our professional lives. The relationship between ethical practice, ethical theory and the climate or culture of healthcare and educational organisations was explored. Participants discussed the importance of history to nursing identity. One participant said that if nurses lose their nursing history they may also lose their identity as nurses.
There was also a good deal of discussion relating to the role and transcultural potential of values such as dignity, autonomy, respect and the African value, ubuntu. It was suggested that we need to discern amongst the concepts of race, culture and ethnicity and also to acknowledge differences amongst tribes within the same region. Translating cultural diversity into ‘meaningful experience’ requires, according to participants, resources and needs to be addressed at different levels. Challenges relating to language and different dialects were also discussed. It was suggested that nurses need to also consider the significance of non-verbal communication.

Key messages of this conference suggest that the development of a transcultural ethics will be advanced by:

  • listening to and learning from each other;
  • ‘bold conversations’ (Pharris) – where nurse ethicists and others can share and explore challenging experiences and perspectives;
  • engaging in theoretical work examining the transcultural potential of ethical concepts and theories;
  • undertaking empirical work to explore the perspectives of nurses and patients in different cultural contexts;
  • nurse leadership demonstrating qualities such as resilience, compassion and pride;
  • nurse educators providing spaces for reflection on issues of diversity; and
  • nurses engaging in critical reflection in relation to culture, gender, sexual orientation, age and class – courage may be required to engage in reflection and discussion, to walk across what might a times feel like a precarious ‘suspension bridge’ (van der Merwe).
  • storytelling – nurses and others sharing their perspectives and experiences as stories or narratives so that we can learn from each other.

Ethicists’ network meeting at ICN Congress on Tuesday 30th June
This meeting provided an opportunity for those interested in ethics to come together the share their experiences and ideas. Participants discussed many of the threats to ethical practice they encounter in their everyday work and suggested how such challenges might be responded to. These included:

  • Concern about ‘moonlighting’ – nurses were taking second jobs as they are underpaid. This raises ethical and professional issues and may contribute to the neglect of patients.
  • A member of a nursing council expressed concern about the attitudes of nurses who appear to ‘justify wrongdoing’ and who lack a sense of accountability. It was suggested that a reason for this may be poor staffing.
  • Participants talked about other pressures on nurses, for example, being on call on days off and enduring a ‘perpetual absence of resources’;
  • Concern was expressed about nurses ‘losing their ethics’ and that ‘accountability is fading’. A view was expressed that nurse managers get blamed for the unethical practice of nurses and that this takes away individual responsibility;
  • Nurses have to fund their own education;
  • Nurses sometimes leave work early and ‘forget about ethics’ – this is because they fear going home in the dark and some don’t have cars;
  • There was experience of nurses leaving work ‘to the next shift’, putting their feet up and saying ‘I’m not going to do it’. The participant said: ’we have a problem and the patient suffers’;
  • Impact of the development of nurses’ rights and unionisation seems to have a negative impact on care putting professionals ‘first and patients second’. It was pointed out that doctors are currently on strike in South Africa;
  • A student nurse shared her experience of being ‘taught shortcuts’ and having three different perspectives on practice – from books, from lecturers and from nurses in practice.

Responses to concerns and strategies to promote ethical practice

  • There is a role for professional codes providing guidance for individual practice but it is also important that organisations support individuals – ‘if you don’t look after your staff, staff won’t look after patients’;
  • The importance of nurses understanding their duty of care and of understanding ethical principles that underpin decision-making;
  • Need for ethics education and time to discuss ethical issues;
  • Nurses need to role model accountability and ethical practice;
  • Employers need to also engage with the ethics of management and prevent ‘toxic management’;
  • Nurses need to contribute to the development of ethical institutions;
  • Educators and practitioners need to take the development of character seriously and to consider nurses’ rights in relation to patients’ rights;
  • All nurses need to be good mentors and role models;
  • Nursing councils have a role in reinforcing ethical practice – one participant suggested that all nurses and students should attend and learn from professional conduct/fitness to practice hearings. This should contribute to their being more ‘vigilant’;
  • Student nurses should aspire to be ‘pacesetters’;
  • Nurses need to develop confidence to challenge unethical practice and reflect on what doing the right thing means;
  • Educators need to develop approaches to ethics and leadership that are meaningful and engaged with practice;
  • Nurses interested in ethics can access the ICNE web-site to share resources and discuss ethical issues (www.nursing-ethics.org).

Conclusion
Overall, the ICN Congress provided many opportunities to discuss and reflect on the meaning and role of nursing ethics in contemporary and global healthcare contexts. Despite the many challenges discussed there was also a strong commitment to the development of nurse professionalism and a determination to work together to respond creatively and ethically.

Ann Gallagher

7th July 2009

Leave a Comment

The Impact of Pandemic ‘Flu on Healthcare Staff


The Impact of Pandemic ‘Flu on Healthcare Staff
Paul Wainwright
In recent months in the UK we have had a debate about the relationship, the so-called covenant, between the Armed Forces and society. The assumption is that because those who serve in the forces accept the risk of death or serious injury in the course of that service they are entitled to special consideration in return. Society, it is argued, has an obligation to ensure that troops are properly equipped and failure to do so may be a breach of human rights if it leads to avoidable death or injury. When personnel are killed or injured, compensation should be provided and the best care be available to the casualty and his or her family.

Other groups who place themselves in harm’s way in public service include the police, social workers, fire and rescue services, ambulance and paramedic staff, and other healthcare professionals. The risks are not usually as severe as those faced by the armed forces in combat, which involve the deliberate efforts of others committed to killing them. However, outbreaks of bubonic plague, cholera, typhoid, and other infections bring accounts of bravery and deaths among those who care for the victims. More health workers have been infected with HIV by patients have patients contracted the virus from staff. In 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) resulted in several deaths among healthcare professionals.

Fears about H5N1 avian influenza and H1N1 influenza (“swine ‘flu”) have added urgency to policy making and planning for what is assumed to be the inevitable ‘flu pandemic. If we do experience a pandemic on anything like the scale predicted, healthcare professionals will be under severe pressure. Health staff will presumably be as likely as any other sector of society to contract influenza in the ordinary course of the pandemic, but those who care for patients with influenza will be at greater risk. They in turn may transmit the disease to those with whom they come into contact, most obviously their immediate family. This may lead to an reluctance on the part of staff to go to work, either from fear for their own safety or from the desire to protect their families. During the Canadian SARS outbreak some staff did refuse to work and were dismissed by their employers as a result. Concerns were also expressed about the perceived lack of protection for staff and their families, a situation analogous to that of troops denied protective clothing or adequately armoured vehicles.

A report from the University of Toronto Joint Centre for Bioethics
Pandemic Influenza Working Group
(
Upshur et al 2005) considers many ethical issues arising from the risk of influenza pandemic. They set out four key ethical issues, a list of ten ethical values and five procedural values that they argue should guide ethical decision making in a pandemic. A similar ethical framework with many of the same concepts has been issued by the Department of Health in England (DH 2007) although this is a comparatively brief document.

The issue of reciprocity is raised by both documents although only the Canadian report discusses the duty of healthcare staff to provide care. Health care professionals have a duty to provide care for many reasons; the Canadian document sets out three:

1. The ability of physicians and health care workers to provide care is greater
than that of the public, thus increasing their obligation to provide care.

2. By freely choosing a profession devoted to care for the ill, they assume
risks.

3. The profession has a social contract that calls on members to be available
in times of emergency. (In addition, they largely work in publicly supported
systems in many countries.)

Reciprocity is the quid pro quo to the duty to provide care. According to Upshur et al “Reciprocity requires that society support those who face a
disproportionate burden in protecting the public good, and take
steps to minimize burdens as much as possible. Measures to
protect the public good are likely to impose a disproportionate
burden on health care workers, patients, and their families”.

The Canadian authors observe that there is disagreement about the amount of risk it reasonable to expect healthcare staff to take and whether staff should have the right to opt out of such dangerous work. The suggest that “health care workers’ ethical codes should provide important
guidance on such issues as professional rights and responsibilities. It is
important for health care professionals, from doctors to nurses to hospital and
ambulance staff, to articulate codes or statements of ethical conduct in high-risk
situations, so that everyone knows what to expect during times of communicable
disease crises”. They argue that professional codes should cover such issues as:

how much risk should health care workers be required to take;

their duty to care for the sick, and to care for themselves so they can
continue to provide care; and

their duty not to harm others by transmitting diseases.

However they claim that there is “currently a vacuum in this field”. They point out that the 2004 Canadian
Medical Association (CMA) revised Code of Ethics provides no clear guidance on the key ethical issues raised by communicable
disease outbreaks, while a quick scan of the UK Nursing and Midwifery Council and the BMA and GMC web sites suggests that the main concern is with competence and the risks of practitioners working outside their normal area of practice with the consequent risks of harm. The Canadian authors point out that

in the past, particularly after the 1919 influenza pandemic, such issues were
explicitly addressed by some codes. For example, the 1922 CMA Code of Ethics
said: “When pestilence prevails, it is their (physicians’) duty to face the danger,
and to continue their labours for the alleviation of suffering, even at the jeopardy
of their own lives.” The American Medical Association used similar language in
its code of ethics from 1846 until the 1950s. The disappearance of this stringent
demand from medical codes of ethics is unexplained, perhaps related to belief in
recent decades that dangerous communicable diseases had been vanquished.
The resurgence of communicable diseases for which there are no ready
defences raises the need for clarity from the professions.

The threat of pandemic flu raises many concerns. The one that appears to cause the greatest concern is the potential shortage of beds and ventilators and the need for triage systems to select those patients who should receive intensive care.. These are difficult and controversial issues and deserve thorough debate. However the question of the duty to provide care and the concept of reciprocity deserve much more public debate.

Leave a Comment

Nurses and Torture

This commentary was provided by Wanda Mohr:

Holocaust survivor and scholar, Primo Levi, stated that: “Monsters exist, but they are too few in numbers to be truly dangerous. More dangerous are…the functionaries ready to believe and act without asking questions. This was exemplified by the Nuremberg trials which exposed the prosaic men and woman who abetted evil on a massive scale, going about their professions while being accomplices to evil on a massive scale.
Six decades after those trials shocked the world with what journalist, Hannah Arendt, described as the banality of evil, health care professionals are once again confronted with the knowledge that physicians, nurses, and medics have been complicit in the abuse and torture of prisoners of war have broken their oaths and violated the dignity of their profession. Thousands of pages in military reports and documents released under the Freedom of Information Act to the American Civil Liberties Union have revealed that the United States and U.K. military personnel tortured prisoners in their custody, that this torture was sanctioned by superiors, and that medical personnel were involved. The International Red Cross reported concerns about mistreatment in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Guantánamo and raised concerns about medical personnel sharing health information with military units that planned interrogations. The Physicians for Human Rights (2008) report on torture by U.S. personnel also implicated health professionals as being complicit in torturing prisoners and denying them medical care. The New England Journal of Medicine (Annas, 2005; Lifton, 2004) and Lancet and the British Medical Journal reported that military medical personnel violated various medical protocols of the Geneva Conventions by helping design coercive interrogation techniques based on detainee medical records and that they failed to report to higher authorities wounds found in prisoners that were caused by torture.
Torture is an ugly word and an ugly deed. As defined by the United Nations convention, it is “… any act by which severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, is intentionally inflicted on a person for such purposes as obtaining from him, or a third person, information or a confession, punishing him for an act he or a third person has committed or is suspected of having committed, or intimidating or coercing him or a third person, or for any reason based on discrimination of any kind when such pain or suffering is inflicted by or at the instigation of or with the consent or acquiescence of a public official or other person acting in an official capacity.”
Although complicity with torture pales in comparison to the actual act that is torture, it constitutes an act of commission or omission that abets the acts and which violates the most sacred tenets of the professions’ ethical codes. Acts of commission can involve the active participation of medical personnel in the wrong-doing, either by way of enhancing its effects, facilitating interrogation, or determining how much agony prisoners can endure. Acts of omission are less active and more covert, and they constitute remaining silent in the face of what is clearly cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment. In addition to the aforementioned, medical personnel concealed evidence of torture, by neglecting to mention it on autopsy reports, or by “losing” or misplacing reports that would have shown that torture was taking place.
Most recently, “Oath Betrayed: America’s Torture Doctors” by Steven Miles M.D., professor of medicine and bioethics at the University of Minnesota School of Medicine, was released in its second edition. In his introduction Miles discusses torture of prisoners and asks: “Where were the doctors and nurses?” His discomforting answer is that physicians, nurses, and other medical personnel were present and silent while prisoners were abused and that physicians and psychologists provided expertise that informed how much and what kind of maltreatment could be dispensed during interrogations. He also provides evidence that mistreatment was monitored and that evidence of torture deaths was concealed by military pathologists. Most disturbingly to our own profession, he provides the name of a nurse and references to data that nurses were complicit and/or silent.
Multiple organizations speak against medical complicity in the torture of prisoners. All of them articulate in some way that it a serious breach of medical ethics for medical personnel to engage either passively or actively in torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or to apply their knowledge or skills in the interrogation of prisoners (e.g. U.N. General Assembly).
It is notable that these current and significant failures may have occurred in spite of the ethical codes that, on paper, seem to direct high standards of practice that should have resulted in quite different outcomes if they had been effective in providing the guidance, direction, accountability and outcomes that they exist to assure. Current ethical codes for professionals such as nurses and counselors are promulgated to assure for sound ethical practice, to ensure professional accountability and to improve practice. As such, the obvious disconnect between ethical ideology and real practice patterns must be addressed.
We may never know the actual scope of the involvement of nursing per se, insofar as the memos and documents are tedious to cross reference and heavily redacted. But any suggestion regarding nursing involvement is disturbing and calls for investigation, commentary, vigorous discussion and debate, and the development of measures to prevent such involvement and to help nurses in difficult situations of this kind in the future.

Wanda K. Mohr PhD, APRN, FAAN
Professor
Psychiatric Mental Health Nursing

Comments (1)

Ethicists Network: Bulletin of the Ethicists Network No 42 May 2009

Dear Colleagues,

As I write this there is global concern about the implications of a swine flu pandemic. I hope that, in your countries, health measures are in place and that citizens have access to appropriate health services.

We are currently developing the ICNE web-site (nursing-ethics@surrey.org ) and hope that from June 2009 we will be able to direct you there for news of ethics-related events and discussion items. I hope, too, that you will send information that we can share with the international nursing ethics community. We would also be very pleased to put a web-link to your national/regional nursing ethics centres and to publicise your events and achievements. I will be in touch in June with more information regarding the development of the web-site.

In this Bulletin, I attach again registration details for the one day Transcultural nursing ethics: learning from each other conference in Durban, South Africa on 28th June 2009. There has been a good deal of interest in this conference and I hope to see many international colleagues there and at the ICN conference events.

There has also been a good response to information relating to the 10th Anniversary ICNE conference at the University of Surrey, UK on the 10th and 11th September 2009.
We have had  a good number of abstracts submitted and I hope you will consider submitting before the deadline of 15th May. The final conference programme and registration form is attached.

I think you will agree that we have very impressive and eminent speakers which should make for a very stimulating conference. I am very pleased that Professor Ruth Chadwick has agreed to deliver a public lecture (Does science need ethics?) which will link the ICNE conference with the Festival of Science taking place at the University in September.

Below are some items of information relating to nursing ethics events in South Africa, Japan and in the UK and an invitation for you to share your views.

****

At the ICN Congress there will be a meeting of the Special Interest Group of Nurse Ethicists, i.e. any members receiving this Newsletter plus anyone else interested who will be at the Congress.

This will take place on 30 June, 16.00-17.30, Room 22ABC. Please also note this in your diary. More details will be sent before then.

****

The Second Conference of the Japanese Nursing Ethics Association

Conference Theme: Ethics as the heart of nursing: Collaboration between academic and clinical nursing

Date: June 6, Sat, 2009

Venue: Saku city, Nagano Prefecture

Conference Chair: Emiko Konishi, Prof, Saku University

Keynote speaker: Anne J Davis, Prof Emerita of UCSF and Nagano College of Nursing

The Japanese Nursing Ethics Association and the associated nursing ethics journal were established in 2008.

For further information about the conference and the journal please contact: Emiko Konishi: e-konishi@saku.ac.jp

****

Colleagues who plan to attend the 10th Anniversary ICNE conference at the University of Surrey on the 10th and 11th September 2009 might also like to attend the 13th International Philosophy of Nursing Conference held in association with the International Philosophy of Nursing Society will take place at the University of the West of England, Bristol, UK, 7th-9th September 2009.

Nursing in an Interdisciplinary World: cooperation, collaboration or compromise?

Confirmed speakers include:
Professor Brenda Cameron, Director, Institute for Philosophical Nursing
Research, University of Alberta, Canada
Michael Luntley, Professor of Philosophy, University of Warwick, UK
Professor Dawn Freshwater, University of Leeds, UK
Professor Ruud ter Meulen, Director, Bristol Centre for Ethics in Medicine,
UK
Dr Pamela J Grace, Associate Professor, Boston College, USA
Dr Timothy W Kirk, Assistant Professor, City University of New York-York
College, USA

Call for papers: Abstracts on the theme (or on any philosophical aspect of health
care practice, research or education) are now invited. Abstracts should not exceed
300 words and should be submitted by 1st May 2009.

Further details can be found on the IPONS website www.ipons.dundee.ac.uk

****

An invitation to share your views and news

In the May Bulletin I invited you to share your views regarding the development of the ICNE web-site. It is not too late to forward your ideas.

I would like your views on the following:

How might the ICNE web-site (See http://www.nursing-ethics.org/) be developed to meet your needs as a nurse ethicist in an international context?

Do you know of a national nursing ethics organisation/association in your country that could be affiliated with ICNE? If so, please include contact details and email address of the director/facilitator.

What nursing ethics resources would you like to see on the ICNE web-site that would help you in your work?

How might the ICNE web-site and the Bulletin help nurse ethicists to improve communication and collaboration in an international context?

If you could send your responses to me by the 30th May I would be very grateful. I look forward to hearing from you and developing the Bulletin and the web-site in the light of your responses. Email your responses to me at the email address below. Thank you.

In the meantime, please use this Network to inform colleagues of initiatives, conferences, news or events that you would like to disseminate here or send to the e-mail addresses below.
****
I look forward to hearing from you.

Very best wishes

Ann Gallagher

a.gallagher@surrey.ac.uk

Leave a Comment